The global economy has been experiencing an unprecedented tough times. Sales are down substantially for most industries except education and affordable food chains. As a result, purchasing volume is down. In many instances, such the auto industry, volume is down by 50% or more. Purchasing organizations with shrinking business find themselves with several suppliers for a given commodity. The result is struggling suppliers with low utilization. In fact, capacity at manufacturers/assemblers could be under 50%.
Buyers are facing a dilemma. Does the buyer keep all of them as active suppliers with low utilization? Or perhaps evaluate all and phase out the weaker ones, shifting business to the stronger suppliers, increasing their capacity?
If the buyer keeps all of their suppliers operating at low capacity, there are several concerns:
- High fixed costs - Suppliers may not be able to stay competitive due to fixed cost.
- Weak revenues - Supplier balance sheets are weakening.
- Service levels - Many are laying off employees, which may reduce level, quality or speed of service.
- Supply chain disruptions - Financially strapped suppliers are selling equipment or closing plants.
On the flip side, buyers should evaluate supplier’s financials in order to mitigate risk and ensure supply continuity. Armed with that information, wise decisions on which suppliers to keep and whom to drop can be made. In this way, the buyer will be able to shift business to the “surviving suppliers”, increasing their capacity, maintaining lower prices, and strengthening the relationship. The buyer will have the opportunity to move forward with the stronger, better performing suppliers.
This course of action does have some potential short and long-term risks. Buyers need to take into consideration the following:
- Present - Competition is reduced if fewer suppliers are utilized.
- Future - When the economy turns around, the suppliers that lost the business might not be there anymore. Buyers will have to develop new sources.
Either way, buyers are facing very unique challenges. However, they need to take the necessary actions to help their organization to survive. Rightsizing the supply base is a smart tactic that can lower costs and promote good financial health in the supply chain.
Erez Azaria is a Senior Consultant in Ariba’s Spend Management Services group. Erez specializes in working with automotive manufacturers on strategic sourcing events.

Loading ...
2 responses so far ↓
1 Ronald Hayes, C.P.M. // Mar 10, 2009 at 6:46 am
While Mr. Azaria has provided a brief and accurate overview of the situation facing many buying organizations, he could add value by conducting a similarly short assessment for types of goods and services. The options and the risks are quite different for custom designed automotive components vs. standard off the shelf commercial products, both of which may be used in an automotive assembly. In recessionary times, often supply solutions such as multi-line distributors can be a lower risk, lower cost option than direct purchases. Mr. Azaria has intiated a subject that could prove quite interesting should he expound on the various situations.
Ron Hayes is a career Automotive Purchasing professional currently developing new strategic relationships and customers for AREA51-ESG an 8(a) disadvantaged minority owned electronics distributor.
2 Supply Excellence — Moody’s “Bottom Rung” List: Are your supplier or customers on it? // Mar 11, 2009 at 4:53 am
[...] Are your supplier or customers on it?Auto Suppliers’ Solvency: A Politician Who “Gets It”Supplier Consolidation in Weakening EconomyAuto Supplier Liquidity (Part 2): Unlocking Cash in ReceivablesAuto Supplier Liquidity (Part 1): [...]
Leave a Comment