In this economy, one thing we can count on is that all organizations will be asked to do is stretch their budgets and increase productivity. And although an efficient procurement department is a net plus on the company’s bottom line, they won’t be immune from the calls to do more with less. So, how do you do it?
Getting more from your organization involves liberating Purchasing staff and organizations from stultifying systems and structures, and from unclear objectives, arbitrary use of power, and the frantic activity and effort (much of it wasted) found in the unorganized organization. Organizational Design is one of the most potent tools available to senior managers for shaping the direction of their organizations. Organizational Design focuses on human behavior at work and, more importantly, how to develop processes and systems that keep employees intellectually engaged, rather than driving them to distraction, burnout…and seeking “other opportunities”.
We have found that CPOs need to keep the following 6 factors in mind to create a successful purchasing organization:
- Design a structure that empowers. Although there is no one-size-fits-all org chart, a well designed organization balances centralization to maximize economies of scale and decentralization to empower local requirements and decision making. Excellent examples are Telefonica, RWE, J&J and Schlumberger (the later 3 are described in this white paper).
- Attract and retain Purchasing talent. With purchasing staff moving away from transactional roles and towards strategic functions, job requirements have changed…a lot. McKinsey Quarterly found that “paying an additional 40% to hire an A player could yield an overall return of 100% or more in a single year.” Once you have found and hired that top talent, retain them by proactively aligning their aspirations with organization goals. Encourage high performers, stimulate their minds and minimize the hassles that hinder their performance.
- Frequently update tools and processes. With the most advanced productivity tools on the market, it’s hard to get bored. This is particularly true of top performers, who typically embrace continuous change and adoption of new capabilities. SAS’ philosophy on the subject sums it up best: help staff do their best work, keep them intellectually engaged, and remove distractions. Evolving technology and processes certainly helps on all 3 fronts.
- Implement meaningful metrics and reward systems. First figure out what metrics will be meaningful for measuring the purchasing organization’s impact on their goals (a chart that maps goals and measurements is available here). Then create rewards that encourage people to care about the metrics. These don’t have to be monetary. Recognition, career-growth, influence and even something as simple as a preferred parking space can be very powerful motivators.
- Nurture a culture of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurs are empowered to perform and tasks and utilize any processes needed to get the job done. They loath overhead (the dreaded bureaucrat’s empire) and always try to do the most with the least. Foster this spirit and your department’s profile, results and reputation with the company will flourish. And your empowered, engaged employees will surprise you with their positive attitudes and creativity.
- Deliver an impact. Once all of the above factors have been integrated into the purchasing organization, success is a sure (or near-sure) thing. Communication and alignment of goals within the department is key. But, it’s also important to sing the praises of your group to the company at large. Be vocal about the achievements in order to grow the influence and spend under management of the procurement organization.
***Sections of this post were based on a white paper I co-authored titled “How to Get More From Your Organization”. You can download the pdf version here.***
Colleen Slaughter is a Senior Consultant in Ariba’s Spend Management Services group. Colleen specializes in Change Management, Talent Management, and Organizational Design.

Loading ...
7 responses so far ↓
1 Charles Dominick, SPSM // Nov 14, 2008 at 3:53 pm
Nice post, Colleen. I’ve downloaded the whitepaper and look forward to reading it!
2 David Heller // Nov 14, 2008 at 5:50 pm
“Frequently update tools and processes”
There is a cost to having to implement, train and handle the MOC of these changes. In my experience people want stability in their tools and processes. Fix defects quickly - yes, react to changing market needs quickly - yes, change for changes sake - no.
Recognizing the abilities of your top performers means also understanding the abilities of your core - the ‘B’ players. This might be 80% of the workforce who won’t be as receptive and able to deal with frequent updates.
3 Colleen Slaughter // Nov 16, 2008 at 3:13 am
Hi David,
Thank you for your comment.
I think we’re in agreement on the change vs. stability issue. And that’s really a GREAT evolution that’s happened in solutions as they have moved to on-demand, where they can incrementally roll out new features and functions. That approach is fast, efficient and allows users (of all levels of ability) to digest change upgrades far easier than in the past when they had less frequent, major, disruptive software “upgrades.
Moreover, understanding the competency level of your core does not mean being satisfied with where they are: while they might not be able to follow changes swiftly, they will, nonetheless, need to adapt to change.
Integrating a Change Management program is key to helping them.
4 Kathy DeLucio // Nov 17, 2008 at 7:16 pm
Thank you for your article. I’m looking for a link to the “chart that maps goals and measurements” mentioned in Item #4 above. The link provided takes me to the white paper article. Your help would be appreciated.
5 Justin Fogarty // Nov 17, 2008 at 9:41 pm
The chart to which Kathy is referring is found on page 10 of the whitepaper (in Section 4, Figure 2).
6 OYELOPO ALIYU // Nov 20, 2008 at 9:05 pm
I NEED MORE EXPLANATION TO KEEP ME MORE UPDATED ON THE ISSUE OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY
7 Kendall Gordan, SE // Dec 1, 2008 at 10:45 pm
Interesting version. Everytime I bring up points 1 & 5, all I see is churn based on 1980’s trickle down economics. I’m looking forward to the article.
Kendall Gordan, SE
http://www.foxfiresoftware.com
Leave a Comment