Supply Excellence

Does the Struggling Economy Put Sustainability on Hold?

November 11th, 2008 · by Justin Fogarty · 7 Comments · LCCS and trade, enviro/social sustainability, oil/energy, sourcing, supply management, supply risk

The struggling world economy has some wondering if we - consumers and businesses alike - have raised expectations in the area of sustainability higher than we can afford. It’s a fair question since past environmental movements have stalled when the economy turned sluggish, as it did in the early 1990s.

Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz wrote an interesting piece on this subject last week on The Huffington Post. His take:

“Now is a time to be bold. Now is a time to invest, truly and authentically, in our people, in our corporate responsibility and in our communities. The argument–and opportunity–for companies to do this has never been more compelling.”

Bold words from an executive who’s company, just four days later, announced some massive Venti sized challenges. But since Schultz is largely behind creating an entire industry that raised demand, expectations and prices for coffee, his record of leadership and anticipating consumer trends make his opinions worthy of consideration.

It seems possible that this time around, sustainability will not only survive the downturn, but actually become part of the solution. Certainly long-term, green collar jobs and renewable energy offer huge opportunities. But in the mean time, it’s easy to see the part that procurement organizations can play in driving sustainability and cost savings.

Now, rather than simply marketing recycled consumer goods or halogen lightbulbs for altruistic citizens, ’sustainability’ has evolved into initiatives that drive efficiency, and even, cost savings. And for companies like Starbucks, sustainable sourcing can actually be a competitive advantage. Schultz, in describing their recently stepped up efforts, wrote:

“We also announced a set of ambitious but realizable goals for the way we source our coffee, how we help to sustain our environment, and what we can do to work with, and continue to contribute to, the communities in which we do our business and the world as a whole. Consumers are spending less and will more closely scrutinize products; they will embrace only the companies and brands they trust and with which they identify.”

In other words, consumers expect companies they know and trust to continue, and even, enhance their sustainability initiatives. Doing anything less would harm the brand and bottom line. So the sourcing and procurement operations will be relied on to drive savings of sustainably sourced direct goods.

But what about companies struggling to extract any further savings on sustainable direct goods, yet still desiring to utilize them in their products as a differentiator? Although those companies may have a tough time keep those costs down, they’ll look to procurement to keep other cost drivers in check. And in many cases, those indirect goods and services still provide opportunity for both savings and sustainability.

With top lines shrinking and consumers desires for affordable green goods still strong, it will be procurement’s responsibility/opportunity to provide sustainable products and savings.

Justin Fogarty is Managing Editor of Supply Excellence. For any questions or feedback on the blog or its contributors, Justin can be reached at jfogarty[at]ariba.com.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Favorites
  • Delicious
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: ····

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Matty // Nov 11, 2008 at 8:14 pm

    How about a follow-up article that shows the specific tactical methods they chose to cut costs?

  • 2 Justin Fogarty // Nov 13, 2008 at 1:28 am

    Great call Matty. I have a few examples in mind. Hope to gather my thoughts and have it up next week sometime.

  • 3 Jason Busch // Nov 13, 2008 at 2:07 am

    You can find specific tactics in a recent whitepaper that I just wrote. This post does a nice job summarizing the themes of the paper — namely cost cutting must be a major driver of sustainability in this economy.

    http://www.spendmatters.com/pages/perspectives_detail.cfm?Asset_ID=00001

  • 4 Justin Fogarty // Nov 13, 2008 at 2:11 am

    “namely cost cutting must be a major driver of sustainability in this economy.”

    Couldn’t agree more Jason. Sustainability initiatives will have to cut costs AND provide real green benefits (greenwashers beware). Luckily, there are options that kill both birds with one stone.

  • 5 Jason Busch // Nov 13, 2008 at 3:59 am

    Justin,

    I’m not supposed to be writing because of a wrist injury (any more than I have to), but I’m going to issue you a challenge because you’ve gotten me enthusiastic again about the topic. And that’s with the mounds and mounds of data you guys have on sourcing events in packaging and other areas where green can play a factor, what about getting quantitative in the discussion. Can you share some specific data points that show green can also lead to savings? I guarantee you’ll get inbounds — and I’ll send some your way — if you can show based on Ariba’s sourcing approaches that your green expertise also ties directly to sourcing.

  • 6 Justin Fogarty // Nov 13, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    Jason,

    As a data/math junkie at heart, I accept the challenge. Once I have the data in hand and have had a chance to digest it, I’ll let you know.

    Thanks,
    Justin

  • 7 Supply Excellence — Sustainability Strategies for Real World Savings // Dec 1, 2008 at 11:51 am

    [...] programs can have in driving bottom line savings during an era of shrinking top line revues, a commenter asked for a follow-up post on the tactics leading organizations are using to achieve results. Great request and I’ll do my best to [...]

Leave a Comment