Supply Excellence

Supply Management Talent Crunch: A Near-Term Solution

March 13th, 2008 · by Tim Minahan · 5 Comments · mid-market/growing enterprise, skills rectruitment and development, supply management

In a special section of the Wall Street Journal (registration required) earlier this week, a duo of supply chain management professors warned that changing global market dynamics require new supply management skills and approaches that most companies lack.

Such findings are not news to the Supply Excellence audience. (Indeed, most of you are feeling the pinch of the talent crunch first hand.) Yet, the article does provide some strong facts that can help you build a business case for recruitment and training budget and resources. The scholars also offer recommendations for solving your skills dilemma in the near-term: staff augmentation.

The professors from the business and management schools of Florida State and North Carolina State University note that managing the supply chain in the face of globalization, offshoring, and an ailing economy “requires a broad skill set that many managers simply don’t have right now.” (This prognosis was echoed in the recent Aberdeen Group CPO Agenda study, in which 74% of senior supply management executives said they “need people with different job skills” on their teams. Download a complimentary copy of the report here.)

Specifically, the scholars’ joint study of supply chain managers found that the following skills or approaches are required to effectively manage supply in today’s global economy:

  • “Big Picture View” — with an emphasis on strategic cost reduction and a greater focus on total cost in supplier selection.
  • Building teams — particularly strategic relationship management with internal and external “customers” and partners.
  • Managing technology — especially electronic procurement and reverse auctions.
  • Finding suppliers globally — especially managing complex outsourcing agreements and developing sound global sourcing strategies. The study found that companies had particular challenges in understanding “the nuances of vital [supply] markets around the world.”

In light of the current economic pressures and the need to expand and compete globally, the professors recommended “If [a company's supply management team] can’t do it all themselves, they must hire people who can do the job for them,” including the use of the “number of consulting companies that have sprung up to supply this global market intelligence.”

This advice echoes the strategy I have heard recently from several CPOs. Consider these comments from the head of global procurement at one of the world’s largest beverage companies: “Grain and commodity prices are killing us right now. We need to rapidly expand our global sourcing efforts and reach new markets across all categories in order to meet our cost savings targets for the year. I can’t train or hire people fast enough to manage this internally. Instead, we are looking to [outside] experts to help meet our sourcing and savings goals.”

Or these from the head of sourcing at a mid-market European high-tech manufacturer: “We’ve adopted e-sourcing and achieved some great savings. However, with constant pricing pressure in our industry, we need to strategic source more volume and more spend [categories] — now. The only way we can do this is in this time frame is with the expertise and support of an external [provider].”

While tapping outside expertise is by no means a long-term solution to the skills gap, a growing number of CPOs are using this strategy to achieve near-term goals. The knowledge transfer and best-practice processes that come from outside experts can also lay the foundation upon which you can build internal competencies and self-sufficiency.

That is the long-term plan of the European high-tech manufacturer referenced above: “We expect the sourcing roadmap, processes, and e-sourcing approaches [used by our outside provider] to eventually become standard operating procedure for our team.” Indeed, leveraging the know-how and practices of outside consultants to build internal competencies is a value that could far exceed the initial savings returned from the engagement.

Tags:

5 responses so far ↓

  • 1 tony // Mar 14, 2008 at 1:34 am

    Really nice article, Tim. I believe that some of the specialization necessary to source certain categories (and the infrequency of sourcing them) could lead to specialized sourcing advisory practices. That isn’t to say that internal resources shouldn’t learn from the event or manage the vendors thereafter. However, the level of skill necessary just isn’t going to be affordable for most companies - the advisory firms also create career paths and compensation that this talent would other not have.

    Examples include telecommunications, energy/utilities, outsourcing, and, possibly, certain direct product categories.

    What are your thoughts?

    Tony
    http:/360vendormanagement.com

  • 2 Good Vendor Managers: A Scarce Commodity | 360° Vendor Management // Mar 14, 2008 at 8:01 am

    [...] Earlier this week we posted an article describing vendor management job descriptions.  Yesterday day, Tim Minaham’s article on the Supply Management Talent Crunch led us to reflect on the “talent crunch” also facing vendor management.  Let’s face it - good vendor managers are hard to find.  Why? [...]

  • 3 Tim Minahan // Mar 14, 2008 at 10:47 am

    Tony:

    I couldn’t agree more. In fact, I believe we are now witnessing the impact of Web 2.0 on business processes — including supply management.

    Specifically, now that many companies have established their supply management technology platforms, I anticipate the delivery of expert content (supply market dynamics, costing templates, risk information) within the context of application-supported business processes. For example, a commodity manager for plastic injection molding could subscribe to a web service that delivers current market dynamics, cost drivers, supplier landscape, and sourcing or costing templates for use within their existing sourcing (dare I say “e-sourcing”?) application.

    To your point, I agree that a cottage industry will emerge to deliver these Web 2.0 information services to the leading supply management platforms.

  • 4 tony // Mar 14, 2008 at 9:17 pm

    I wonder how these info services will be provided to buyers. Obviously, some will be analyst research, which are easy to syndicate. The folks at Ariba are clearly trying to get into this niche. Definitely interesting ideas. I work with a lot of outsourcing arrangements and wonder how to syndicate this info in a manner that buyers can find useful, while still maximizing ROI.

  • 5 @ Supply Chain Management » Blog Archives » Supply Management Talent Crunch // Mar 23, 2008 at 12:02 pm

    [...] I came across this story via Supply Excellence, which tagged a story in WSJ (registration required) and Aberdeen (free report available until April 28, 2008 with registration), [...]

Leave a Comment