Last week, Spend Matters Jason Busch shared insights from his show-of-hands survey of an audience comprised largely of Mid-West companies from the “larger end of the mid-market” (an oxymoron unto itself). Despite this rather unscientific method of polling and sample selection (about 35 attendees at a seminar hosted by a group purchasing organization), Jason’s findings were representative of the broader mid-market:
- Supply management “technology adoption even in larger middle market companies remains low.”
- Many mid-market firms “are embracing a category partnering / sourcing approach to working with” GPOs before they invest in broader technology roll-outs across their spend categories.
- There’s a great degree of skepticism towards ERP capability and direction, at least within this group of larger middle market users.
While I might take debate with the second point (this was a seminar hosted by a GPO, after all), Jason’s findings echo those of other recent studies of supply management trends among mid-sized enterprises.
An Aberdeen Group benchmark of supply management, supply chain, and finance executives at more than 130 mid-market companies found that the typical mid-size firm applies disciplined strategic sourcing to only about one-third of total spending.
What’s the problem? Aberdeen uncovered four hurdles to effective sourcing and supply management at mid-market firms:
- Lack of formal sourcing procedures and organizations — less than 40% of mid-market firms lack a formal strategic sourcing group. Eighty percent of mid-market sourcing efforts either lack formal procedures, are decentralized, or only use formal approaches for their most critical spend.
- Lack of sourcing and commodity skills — mid-market companies lack basic strategic sourcing principles as well as category expertise.
- Insufficient sourcing or supply management automation – more than 80% of mid-market firms use a hodepodge of homegrown sourcing automation and offline communications to facilitate sourcing and supplier management projects.
- Little spend leverage — mid-size enterprises often lack the spending clout to aggressively negotiate best-pricing and terms with suppliers.
Such inadequate competencies limit the ability of mid-size enterprises to leverage already diminutive spending volumes, assess supply market opportunities and costs, and drive cotinuous improvements in supply costs and performance. Case in point: Aberdeen to estimates that “Insufficient sourcing is costing mid-sized firms in the U.S. $134 billion in missed savings opportunities annually.”
However, these challenges only tell part of the story. Tomorrow we’ll investigate how mid-market companies are ramping up to address the supply management challenge. We’ll also examine the supply management approach and results one mid-market company was able to achieve.
In the meantime, download a complimentary copy of the Aberdeen Group report, Strategic Sourcing in the Mid-Market: The Echo Boom in Supply Management.

Loading ...
Save to Browser Favorites
Ask
backflip
blinklist
BlogBookmark
Bloglines
BlogMarks
Blogsvine
BUMPzee!
CiteULike
co.mments
Connotea
del.icio.us
DotNetKicks
Digg
diigo
dropjack.com
dzone
Facebook
Fark
Faves
Feed Me Links
Friendsite
folkd.com
Furl
Google
Hugg
Jeqq
Kaboodle
linkaGoGo
LinksMarker
Ma.gnolia
Mister Wong
Mixx
MySpace
MyWeb
Netvouz
Newsvine
PlugIM
popcurrent
Propeller
Reddit
Rojo
Segnalo
Shoutwire
Simpy
sk*rt
Slashdot
Sphere
Sphinn
Spurl.net
Squidoo
StumbleUpon
Technorati
ThisNext
Webride
Windows Live
Yahoo!
Email This to a Friend
If you like this then please subscribe to the 
1 response so far ↓
1 Supply Excellence » Supply Management: What it Takes for Mid-Market Success // Feb 21, 2007 at 8:12 am
[...] Monday, I provided ballast for recent findings from Spend Matters that insufficient (and, at times, non-existent) supply management capabilities are putting mid-market firms at cost and operational disadvantages. [...]
Leave a Comment