Supply Excellence

Turning the Talent Crunch into an Opportunity

January 9th, 2007 · by Tim Minahan · 2 Comments · best practices, skills rectruitment and development, supply management

I realize that I’ve been banging the drum loudly lately about the pending supply management talent crisis. And, at the risk of sounding too much like an Al Gore the-sky-has-a-hole-in-it sensationalist, the evidence that there is a huge fissure in the supply management talent pool continues to mount.

In recent weeks, Aberdeen Group cited recruiting and retaining top talent as the #1 challenge facing CPOs today. Purchasing Magazine noted that the talent crunch is driving up salaries. And supply management executives have been ranting to me that other companies (and functions) are stealing their best talent.

Recognizing that every acid-rain ladened cloud has a titanium lining, a new study from Next Level Purchasing reveals strategies supply managers can use to leverage the talent crisis to their advantage. Based on a survey of 1,200 purchasing and supply management professionals, The 2007 Purchasing & Supply Management Career & Skills Report, recommends the following approaches for getting ahead:

  • Develop the right skills: According to the survey, the most important skills for supply managers include communications and relationship management; planning and strategy development; supplier development and management; sourcing and supplier selection; negotiation; and best practices implementation. Also on the list were developing technology skills and project management skills, which, as I noted here, is shaping up to the be quickest way for a supply management professional to move up the career ladder.
  • Spend more time in training: The study revealed that the typical purchasing and supply management professional devotes just 18.5 hours per year to training each year. That’s up a full hour from last year, but far off the pace of the top 5% of supply management professionals who devoted a whopping 80 hours to training in the past year.
  • Get certified: According to the study, employers are increasingly seeking candidates with a professional qualification or certification, such as ISM’s Certified Purchasing Manager (C.P.M.), Certified Professional in Supply Management (CPSM), or Accredited Purchasing Practitioner (A.P.P.) credentials. Of course, report author and Next Level President Charles Dominick, recommends the Senior Professional in Supply Management (SPSM) Certification, which is a globally recognized certification program founded by Next Level. (In Charles’ defense, the SPSM program is more in touch with today’s global and technology-driven supply management profession than the traditional C.P.M. certification.) That said, the study backs up Charles recommendation, finding that “individuals who have the SPSM Certification earn an average of $13,634 (US) more per year” than those who don’t. The point? Credentials matter. Get some — soon.

The full report reviews survey results on the latest supply management trends, preferred nomenclature for the purchasing discipline (more on that later), and more detail on career and skills planning. You can access the full report for free by registering for Next Level’s Free Purchasing Resources Program.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati Favorites
  • Delicious
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags:

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Tim Cummins // Jan 11, 2007 at 12:01 pm

    Interestingly, our research does not support the view that talent is the #1 issue. Recruiting and retaining staff is in fourth place in our global survey of Procurement / Sourcing heads. And in North America, it slips even further down the list.

    We asked executives, managers and practitioners worldwide to tell us what their top issues are as they enter 2007. For those in the ‘advanced’ economies, workload is resoundingly #1 at all job levels. This contracts with a very different perspective (and hunger) in emerging markets - where skills an dknowledge represent the big concern at both a functional and personal level. Maybe it is a further sign of the switch in economic power!

    IACCM will shortly issue a full report from this important study and outline the stpes being taken to assist companies with addressing their concerns.

  • 2 Tim Minahan // Jan 11, 2007 at 7:17 pm

    Thanks, Tim. We anxiously await your recommendations.

    Having emerged from the research community, I know that surveying is part science, part art. The discrepencies in answers most likely lie in the research methods and audience. If both surveys used multiple choice questions, respondents answers are limited to providing degrees of importance within the options presented. On the other hand, open ended questions provide more accurate/unconstrained responses. However, the variation is terminology is so great that the reported findings depend on how respondent comments were interpreted and reconciled by the researcher.

    Upshot: good research is a combination of unbiased methods, a qualified research pool, and an experienced and unbiased analyst to interpret the results.

    It’s true what Disraeli said: “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” My vote is for the statistics.

Leave a Comment